the week of Sunday, March 5th, 2017

Wednesday, March 8th, 2017, Wednesday Seminar

4:10 PM, 55 Roessler
Tea and cookies at 3:45 in the aviary - (2110 EPS)

“Building robust kinematic models to better understand complex orogenic systems”

      – by Arlo Weil, Bryn Mawr College

Determining the kinematics of orogenic systems is crucial for improving our understanding of tectonic processes, the mechanics of mountain building, and the dynamic links between plate boundary processes and deformation of foreland structures. My focus in this regard has been on improving our understanding of foreland systems, and in particular investigating the interactions between thick-skin and thin-skin belts; relations of contractional intraplate deformation to plate dynamics including flat-slab subduction; and influences of pre-existing basement and sedimentary cover architecture on subsequent crustal deformation. Toward these ends, detailed mesoscopic structural, strain, anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility (AMS), and paleomagnetic data have been analyzed from over 600 sites in the North American Cordillera, and over 200 sites in the Precordillera and Sierra Pampeanas systems of the Argentinian Andes. These data sets are then be used to test competing kinematic models, and ultimately integrated with existing data to constrain the temporal evolution of foreland deformation and regional tectonic evolution of the North American Cordillera and Argentinian Andes.

    iCal icon


Thursday, March 9th, 2017, Special Seminar

12:10 PM, 1309 Earth and Physical Sciences

“Characteristics of the stress drops for intralslab earthquakes beneath Tohoku and Hokkaido, northeastern Japan”

      – by Prof. Saeko Kita, Hiroshima University

1. Introduction

Kita and Katsumata [2015] estimated the stress drops of ~2000 small-to-middle magnitude events in the Pacific plate at intermediate-depths and examined the spatial variation of stress drops of them. Some previous studies reported some degree of dependence of the stress drop on the focal mechanism of earthquakes. Kita et al. [2010] revealed that stress regime in the slab beneath Hokkaido is quite different that beneath Tohoku. In order to understand the characteristics of nature of the intermediate-depth intraslab earthquakes and relationship of stress drops and stress field, I examined characteristics of stress drops for ~5000 intraslab earthquakes beneath Tohoku and compared the results with that beneath Hokkaido.



2. Data and method

I adopted method and analysis procedure from Kita and Katsumata [2015, G-cubed]. In the estimation of stress drops of the events, I used corner frequencies of 5094 events from 70 to 200 km (August 2003 to July 2014) estimated by S-coda wave spectrum ratio method [e.g., Mayeda et al., 2007].



3. Results and Discussion

The stress drops of events generally increased with depth at depths of 70 to 200 km, which corresponds to results beneath Hokkaido. In the oceanic crust, we also found a decrease of median stress drops at depths of 70 to 110 km (6.8 to 3.6 MPa) and an increase with depth at depths of 110 to 170 km (3.6 to 8.6 Mpa). This depth variation also corresponds to that beneath Hokkaido. Depth change of rigidities due to eclogite-forming phase change with dehydration causes the depth variation of stress drops in the oceanic crust. At the depth of 70 to 170 km, median stress drops for events in the oceanic crust (3.6 to 8.6 MPa) are smaller than those in the oceanic mantle (7.2 to 13 Mpa). Differences of rigidities and/or rupture mechanisms of events could induce the difference between the stress drops of events in the oceanic crust and those in the oceanic mantle. In the oceanic mantle, median stress drops of events between the double seismic planes, which yields downdip compression stress field, is larger than those of the lower plane event, which yield downdip tension. This characteristics beneath Tohoku is different from that beneath Hokkaido, which implies that difference of stress field could cause the difference of the stress drops.

    iCal icon


Thursday, March 9th, 2017, CIG Webinar

2:00 PM, Adobe Connect

“Introduction to the spectral-infinite-element method”

      – by Hom Nath Gharti and Jeroen Tromp, Princeton University

The governing equations for the elastic-gravitational deformation of an Earth model involve a perturbed gravitational potential. The gravitational potential is governed by Poisson’s equation inside the Earth and by Laplace’s equation in the rest of space. The infinite domain and large-scale nature of the problem poses difficult challenges for numerical simulations in 3D Earth models. In order to tackle these challenges, we introduce a spectral-infinite-element method by combining the spectral-element method with the mapped infinite-element method. Spectral elements are used to represent internal fields, and infinite elements represent the external gravitational field. Infinite elements naturally couple with spectral elements, thereby avoiding an iterative procedure which is necessary if the Poisson/Laplace equation has to be solved independently. Potential applications of new method include long-period seismic wave propagation, as well as quasistatic problems, such as post-earthquake relaxation and glacial isostatic adjustment.

    iCal icon


Friday, March 10th, 2017, Friday Brown Bag

12:10 PM, 1316 Earth and Physical Sciences

“Estimation of interplate slow slip from repeating earthquakes and the response of repeaters to slip rate changes by the 2011 Tohoku-oki earthquake”

      – by Prof. Naoki Uchida, Tohoku University

    iCal icon


  Return to the main calendar page.